A participant on the Neil Cavuto Fox News
program this Saturday morning said the SCIENCE has proven the disastrous effects
of carbon dioxide emissions to the atmosphere. There were no objections to this
statement among the other participants. This bothers me horrendously, because it
implied to the general viewing public that this is a correct assertion, since it
was not challenged by any of the panel experts.
However the fact is, that
this is a hoax, which continues to be perpetuated by those expecting to make
some kind of personal profit in its acceptance. The government is particularly
anxious to have the public accept this assertion, because it brings tremendous
new opportunities for taxation, with subsequent increase in government size and
power.
Most people now have a high school education, part of which was to
take a course in chemistry and another course in physics. With discussions of
variability on quality of the courses aside, one can be sure that anyone taking
these courses received at least a smattering of scientific thought process plus
some basic understandings of chemistry and physics principles. The problem is
that most these graduates, do not have the confidence of questionable thinking
when so-called experts come out with new concepts, such as carbon dioxide
relating to global warming. One of the reasons for this is that the experts
develop their own lexicon of terms which intimidate average persons.
For
a great many years all Roman Catholic masses were conducted completely in Latin.
Similarly, the medical profession established use of Latin terms for various
diseases and treatments. Botanists and others have done the same. While there is
some practicality in using Latin designations, by and large this was done in
order to preserve in the public eye a maintenance of esteem esteem for priests,
medical doctors. Now big science has seized on this opportunity as well. But
although, new terms are developed which can be intimidating to the public, all
should be explainable to any person of reasonable intelligence who has received
a high school degree. If not, the correct assumption would be that the
perpetrator is hoodwinking the general public, and that is what is occurring in
a matter of carbon dioxide relating to global warming.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment