Tuesday, June 29, 2010

Obama's Hard Sell of Cap & Trade to Senators

E-Mail to Congress:

EIN News says, "President Obama's 'Moment of Truth' for Energy Bill. With time ticking away before the midterm elections, President Barack Obama hosts a bipartisan group of senators at the White House in the hope of finding some consensus on capping greenhouse gases. (politico.com)".

The consensus for this idea must be to kill it in the womb, as if it were Rosemary's Baby. The proposal is stupid and nonsensical. I previously had a high regard for the English, but this theory of carbon dioxide significantly contributing to global warming takes my regard down many notches.

I normally take a negotiating attitude in resolving a problem, but this is no problem. It is an absurd proposal. The outcome of the negotiation must be that Senators will collectively fight tooth and nail against the Administration on this proposal to destroy the American economy.

Wednesday, June 9, 2010

Climate Change Bill Will Radically Reduce American Lifestyle

E-Mail to Congress:

EIN News says, "Support for U.S. Climate Regulation Growing, Poll Finds. A growing number of Americans want the United States to regulate greenhouse gas emissions as the largest oil spill in U.S. history helps boost interest in petroleum alternatives, a poll by two universities found. (reuters.com)".

I suppose the public may be thinking that by reducing carbon dioxide emission, we will reduce the use of gasoline and diesel fuel. If we don't use gasoline and diesel fuel, we won't need crude oil from the Gulf or anywhere else and this will eliminate the possibility of oil spills.

Even though there is no relation between carbon dioxide emission and climate change, there are some other favorable aspects to the proposal. The noise level from automotive vehicles will be significantly reduced. People will be more healthful by walking and bicycle riding. People will spend significantly less money on purchase of automobiles and their upkeep.

Unfortunately, there will be some downsides. There will be no pleasure from driving an automotive vehicle. More time will be spent traveling to and from the grocery store. Visiting friends or relatives in other parts of town or the country will be eliminated. Jobs for making and maintaining automotive vehicles will be eliminated. Jobs for producing and refining crude oil will be eliminated.

Everything has its upsides and downsides. I like my automobile. It is very helpful to me for my standard of living. I am willing to spend the money on its upkeep. Any carbon dioxide emitted in its operation will have no effect on climate change.

As a Representative, I suggest you be careful of what people say they want. In many cases "they know not what they do".

Wednesday, June 2, 2010

Lieberman/Kerry Climate Bill Is a Fraud and Deception

E-Mail to Congress:

Senators Lieberman and Kerry introduced their climate-change bill in the Senate last month. (Chemical and Engineering News, May 17, 2010, page 10). The bill is nearly 1000 pages long.

The purpose of very lengthy bills is to hide something within and/or include enough "goodies" that Representatives and Senators will pass the bills in consideration that the negative aspects will likely do little harm.

In this case, the inclusion of Cap & Trade will do irreparable harm to our economy.

In addition to the questionable ethics of deviously promoting a negative aspect, there is another consideration. The bill includes start of CO2 compliance in 2016. If this is an urgent matter, why the postponement for six years? Answer: No one really knows what the situation will be 6 years down the road and most people realize this. Therefore, it is another incentive to pass the bill, because most Representatives and Senators will take the attitude that they can vote positively on the bill now, since nothing bad will happen for six years.

This bill is a fraud and deception. I realize you and other Republicans will vote against it, but you are outnumbered. The only opportunity to kill it is to obtain the cooperation of some Democrats. Not all Democrats are committed to the World-Order, with the distraction of the United States. Many of them have just not yet seen the World Order program of the Obama administration. Many are also uneducated on aspects of climate, including global warming, and do not realize that it has no scientific basis. It is your job to educate as many of these Democrats as possible. Do not talk with Republicans, other than to form a coordinated educational program for Democrats. Then, educate the more reasonable Democrats on this subject. If you need scientific facts for the convincing, I am available.