Copenhagen Conference

E-mail to Rep. Neugebauer:

You replied to one of my e-mails as follows, "Should the Obama Administration agree to a treaty at the Copenhagen meeting, the United States Senate would need to ratify that treaty for the United States to implement it. I am deeply concerned by the Obama Administration's pursuit of an energy policy that could lead to America's reduction of industrial output and reduce our competitiveness with other countries. I opposed legislation known as "cap and trade" that would tax carbon output when it came before the House of Representatives, and I will continue to oppose any costly mandate on CO2 reduction, particularly as long as China, India and other emerging industrial countries are exempt from agreements and do not make similar commitments."

I appreciate your reply and your position.

The general public has been overcoming its fear of global warming from a continued barrage of negative information, including the release of a stack of original e-mails showing at best the difference among scientists concerning the validity of the consideration, including greenhouse gases and carbon dioxide. There are now seems to be less than a majority of voters who believe global warming is a valid consideration.

In spite of the change in public attitude, President Obama and his Administration continue to push a program, which would involve the United States in a disastrous energy-use capability and markedly increase the US deficit, as it delivers funds to undeveloped countries for their support in the fiasco.

President Obama is placing his reputation on the line, in the belief that Congress will support him in about anything he says or commits to with regard to climate control. This is now a key element in determining whether the US is controlled by President Obama or the U.S. Congress. The fight is on! If you and your associates in the House, and especially in the Senate which will be required to ratify a treaty, are able to defeat President Obama on this issue, he stands a good chance of rapidly losing face and his ability to do further damage to the economy and individual freedoms of the American people.

I am sure that Representatives and Senators have been concerned with challenging President Obama previously, because of his high public approval, which implied that you might be voted out of office if you challenged. That has now changed. President Obama's public approval is considerably reduced and the majority of those who maintain his support are in a non-reliable voting category. Now is the time to institute the challenge, because the voting public is likely moving toward a more conservative position, and you may be voted out if you support President Obama or do nothing to help in his ouster.